Unfinished notes on Richard Florida

View Comments

The idea of Richard Floridas book The Rise of the Creative Class is: when production has moved to the third world, immaterial production and creativity is the prime value source for western societies, from scientists and programmers to artists and marketeers. The task is to create urban environments to attract this creative class, which involves for example large gay communities and lots of ethnic restaurants.

This is interesting because it means intellectual property. The computer industry, the entertainment industry and the bio industry. The big copyright and patent holders. You attract talented people, protect their work with strong IP-laws and watch them create.

But this is far from the truth. The name “Creative Industries” is devious. It sound like an industry that is creative, but in fact, it is an industry that uses creativity as its raw material. So creativity is actually created in an environment external to the creative industries and in an environment much more characterized by free sharing than pleas for stronger IP laws. It’s hard to find a word for these evironments. The underground, independents, the internets, kopimists have all been used. Choose one. I choose kopimists.

The relation between the creative industries and the kopimists might seem like a fair deal. The kopimists gets resources to create and attention and the industry gets trust, authenticity. And maybe it can be. But copyright can destroy that by suffocating the free sharing.

It’s usually not the kopimists that benefit from the creativity, but the so called creative industries that uses this creativity as raw material. The creative class can make a living of administrating creativity, but the kopimists often live under more precarious conditions with welfare, student loans or extra jobs. Creating preconditions for this kind of class requires a different strategy to the one of Richard Florida.

Adam Arvidsson concludes an article like this:

Could a creative proletariat on welfare be conceived as a sort of publicly funded immaterial externality, that is valorized either through its appropriation by the culture industries, or more indirectly, through its contribution to the urban gentrification processes that are a key driver behind real estate prices?

Related posts:

  1. Ownership and Belonging
  2. Svar på italienska frågor
  3. BRNO
  4. Sound Days
  5. Notes on Networks

Written by admin

June 9th, 2007 at 3:42 pm

Posted in LARGE

Tagged with ,

  • Copyriot » Indragen kvällstrafik är ett sabotage mot Stockholms kulturliv

    [...] politiker drar in vardagarnas kvällstrafik. Gärna ta taxin till Färgfabriken för att lyssna på Richard Florida för att sedan peta in lite tjusiga formuleringar om den kreativa klassen i politiska [...]

  • Hade nyligen föredrag som Piratbyråre… « Fade to Grey

    [...] även goda och dåliga resonemang kring kreativa industrier i ett utvecklingsperspektiv och vackra utsvävningar om det digitalas väsen (lånade Lessigs [...]

  • Föredrag för centern « Fade to Grey

    [...] även goda och dåliga resonemang kring kreativa industrier i ett utvecklingsperspektiv och vackra utsvävningar om det digitalas väsen (lånade Lessigs [...]

  • Talangfunktionen « Fade to Grey

    [...] annan teoretiker som talat sig varm för talang är Richard Florida med sina teorier om den kreativa klassen och de kreativa städer som lockar denna klass. En välbekant teori som bygger på att dagens [...]

  • playfish

    i wouldn’t have suspected this was interesting just a few years back however it’s funny the way years shifts the manner in which you comprehend totally different ideas, thank you regarding the write-up it is actually pleasant to browse through anything sensible now and then in lieu of the ordinary garbage mascarading as a blog on the net, i’m going to play a few rounds of zynga poker, take care

blog comments powered by Disqus